From 88f8307726b025fc272558e2123b86bf119d5fc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Mylund Nielsen Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:45:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Changed the line about serialization to avoid confusion. We do do that now (via Save), but not in the way this referred to. --- README | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index d54587f..cbcf8c3 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ downtime quickly. } // If you store a reference type like a pointer, slice, map or channel, you - // do not need to run Set if you modify the underlying data. The cache does - // not serialize its data, so if you modify a struct whose pointer you've - // stored in the cache, retrieving that pointer with Get will point you to - // the same data: + // do not need to run Set if you modify the underlying data. The cached + // reference points to the same memory, so if you modify a struct whose + // pointer you've stored in the cache, retrieving that pointer with Get will + // point you to the same data: foo := &MyStruct{Num: 1} c.Set("foo", foo, 0) ...